新闻稿阿根廷最高法院拒绝欺诈性厄瓜多尔判决

加利福尼亚州圣拉蒙。2020年7月31日- 阿根廷最高的法院一致拒绝原告的最终出价强制执行欺诈为95亿美元的厄瓜多尔对Chevron Corporation的判决。betwayapp下载This is the latest in a string of legal victories in Chevron’s global defense against the Ecuadorian judgment—found by U.S. courts to be the product of fraud, bribery, and corruption, and held unenforceable as a matter of international law by an international arbitral tribunal in The Hague.

On July 30, in a unanimous 5-0 decision, the Supreme Court of Argentina dismissed the plaintiffs’ appeal from the decision by the Court of Appeals in Buenos Aires of July 3, 2018, which affirmed the trial court’s opinion and dismissed the Ecuadorian plaintiffs’ action for lack of jurisdiction. Argentina’s courts have now uniformly and definitively rejected the plaintiffs’ attempt to recognize and enforce the Ecuadorian judgment in that nation.

随着阿根廷最高法院的决定,寻求承认腐败的厄瓜多尔判决的最后一项继续进行了结束。法院和法庭在美国的决定,巴西,加拿大,直布罗陀,海牙和现在阿根廷,确认欺诈性厄瓜多尔判决应在任何尊重法治的法庭上无法执行。即使是厄瓜多尔共和国,也是对守卫诉讼的长期支持者,终于承认了本月早些时候公开申请其法院对雪佛龙发出的95亿美元判决是“欺诈”。

雪佛龙已击败所有行动迄今为止,寻求承认和执行该判决。2019年7月,加拿大最高法院拒绝审查较低的法院舆论驳回加拿大对雪佛龙间接子公司的行动,原告驳回了加拿大认可程序。2017年11月,巴西最高法院驳回了该国带来的承认行动。巴西和阿根廷的检察官以前认为厄瓜多尔判决是无法执行的,因为它是欺诈和腐败的产物。

与腐败的厄瓜多尔判决有关的关键进展是雪佛龙在海牙国际法庭之前对厄瓜多尔共和国的仲裁。2018年法庭统治了人文责任,仲裁现在处于损失阶段,距离厄瓜多尔共和国寻求越来越多的核武器成本,雪佛龙已经产生并抵御犯罪的欺诈。

在2018年决定的一定决定中,包括厄瓜多尔选择的仲裁员 - 举行的仲裁员 - 通过欺诈,包括司法贿赂,勒索和敲诈勒索,在2011年对厄瓜多尔的厄瓜多尔举行的95亿美元判决。presiding judge allowing the plaintiffs’ team to ghostwrite the judgment itself in exchange for the promise of a bribe. Finding the evidence propounded by Chevron to be “overwhelming,” the tribunal held that “[s]hort of a signed confession by the miscreants . . . the evidence establishing ‘ghostwriting’ in this arbitration ‘must be the most thorough documentary, video, and testimonial proof of fraud ever put before an arbitral tribunal.’”

国际法庭进一步召开,厄瓜多尔共和国从相同的环境索赔,伪造厄瓜多尔判决的全国申请公布,距离厄瓜多尔政府批准的4000万美元的环境修复方案进行了全面的环境索赔。国际法庭发现,厄瓜多尔判决违反了国际法,不应在世界上的任何地方执行。

法庭在海牙的调查结果与美国法院的调查结果一致。In 2014, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York found that Steven Donziger and his team procured the Ecuadorian judgment against Chevron through fraud and racketeering, including extortion, money laundering, wire fraud, witness tampering, judicial bribery, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations, and obstruction of justice. The court prohibited enforcement of the Ecuadorian judgment in the United States and ordered the Ecuadorian plaintiffs and their lawyers to pay back to Chevron any enforcement proceeds they obtain anywhere in the world. The U.S. court judgment is now final after having been unanimously affirmed by the Court of Appeals and denied review by the Supreme Court. In 2018, Donziger was suspended from the practice of law for his misconduct in the Ecuador litigation. In May 2019, Donziger was held in civil contempt of court for his breach of the RICO judgment, which prevented him from profiting from the fraud, by selling interests in the Ecuadorian judgment to investors and using a large portion of the proceeds on personal expenses. In July 2019, Donziger was charged with criminal contempt due to his ongoing refusal to comply with court orders. Chevron is not a party to the criminal contempt proceedings.

Donziger不是唯一唯一涉及华尔街日报所谓“世纪法律欺诈”的律师的律师的律师。Ecuadorian counsel Pablo Fajardo was condemned alongside Donziger by both U.S. courts and the arbitral tribunal in The Hague, which concluded that both “engaged in prolonged, malign conduct towards [Ecuador’s] legal system generally and, particularly, the Lago Agrio Court in a manner that almost beggars belief in its arrogant contempt for elemental principles of truth and justice.” In May 2018, the Supreme Court of Gibraltar issued a judgment against Fajardo and other participants in the fraud for their role in attempting to enforce the Ecuadorian judgment, awarding $38 million in damages to Chevron.

出版:2020年7月